contacts, searches on internet, use of specific search terms or strings, filtering or limitations and literature provided directly by stakeholders. Searches: search terms and languages, comprehensiveness and effectiveness of the search, search strings and/or combinations of searches, databases, searches for grey literature i.e.This should include a clear description of all stages of the review process and the design of the review, the setting, the type of participants or materials involved, and the type of analysis, including: You may also wish to use this section to mention discussions that have been organized with stakeholders and the role of stakeholders in the formulation of the question should be described and explained. The section should end with the main question(s) of the review and a brief statement of what is being reported with reference to participants, interventions, outcomes and study design (PICO). This section should be written in a way that is accessible to researchers without specialist knowledge in that area and must clearly explain why a systematic review on this topic was needed and what it aimed to contribute to the field. The Main text should consist of following sections. Three to ten keywords representing the main content of the article. See our editorial policies for more information on trial registration. Please note that there should be no space between the letters and numbers of your trial registration number. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73824458). Trial registration: if your systematic review reports the results of a controlled health care intervention, please list your trial registry, along with the unique identifying number (e.g.Registration: authors are asked to provide registration information about the systematic review, including a registration number, if available.Conclusions: brief summary and potential implications for policy/management and research.Results: the main findings, including results of search and assessment of evidence base.Methods: how the review was performed, including data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants and interventions study appraisal and statistical tests used.Background: the context and purpose of the review, including the review question.(non-structured abstract is also acceptable in case of a narrative review) : The abstract of the manuscript should not exceed 350 words and must be structured into separate sections. Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. Use of an LLM should be properly documented in the Methods section (and if a Methods section is not available, in a suitable alternative part) of the manuscript Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, do not currently satisfy our authorship criteria.If you would like the names of the individual members of the Group to be searchable through their individual PubMed records, please include this information in the “Acknowledgements” section in accordance with the instructions below if a collaboration group should be listed as an author, please list the Group name as an author.list the full names and institutional addresses for all authors.present a title that includes, if appropriate, the study design.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |